an admirable
display of Updike-like insight into the absurdities of modern behaviour
pp. 229
Published: Profile Books, 2003
It often takes a significant event in a writer’s life to
make me realise that I have neglected them in my reading. Recently, Gabriel
Garcia Marquez’s death alarmed me to the fact that I had never, despite
intending to on many occasions, read a single word he had written. I quickly
rectified this and now have about three or four of his novels under my belt
(though shamefully not his masterpiece, One
Hundred Years of Solitude, which I am still questing after and will
probably share with you on here in the next month or two when I finally manage
to get my hands on it). A similar thing has happened this last week with Alan Bennett,
although the event was nothing so severe as his death. As he celebrated his 80th
birthday on May 9th, I decided that I would delve into the literary
creations of the mind that brought us The
History Boys and Talking Heads.
Bennett’s 2005 book of three novellas is an admirable
display of Updike-like insight into the absurdities of modern behaviour, mixed
with some not entirely successful literary liberties that he takes with the
narratives, and not to mention some hilarious set pieces.
The first story, The
Laying on of Hands, about a memorial service for a sexually rampant masseur
that goes awry when the congregation are invited to share their experiences
with the man, contains some harshly critical satire about the celebrity culture,
as when an autograph hunter asks the partner of a soap-star, ‘‘Are you anybody?
... or are you just with him?’’. This piece, beyond the humour, has some
interesting ideas about how the dead can be moulded, personality-wise, into
anything depending on the fickle and unreliable nature of the memories of those
left behind.
The Clothes They
Stood Up In is
the second story, this one about how a couple reacts when they come home one
night to find that the entirety of their belongings have been removed from
their apartment. It is a burglary ‘so comprehensive as to have taken in both
the toilet role and its holder’. So, literally, everything, except the walls
that contained it all (they did take the carpets, though). The questions that
are raised as a consequence of this are to do with how we can rebuild our lives
without our possessions. How do we define ourselves when the only things we
have retained from a lifetime of purchasing, hoarding, collecting and
inheriting, are the clothes on our backs.
The inexplicable injection of postmodernism towards the end,
however, taints the piece a little for me. Suddenly Mr Ransome is treated
self-reflexively as a character who can be manipulated, rather than as a real person,
and because this technique has no basis in the rest of the story, it seems a
bit like an adopted child of a different race.
I have a similar quarrel with the third and final story in
the collection, Father! Father! Burning
Bright, which has a dream sequence somewhere in the middle. Here, this technique
seems to me to be nothing more than a misused literary tool designed to express
a protagonist’s anxieties without having to adhere to the strict limitations of
reality that Bennett heeds everywhere else in the book. In my opinion, a writer
of any kind of realist fiction should have the skill to express inner character
without resorting to ‘cop-out tricks’, and relating the disconnected
meanderings of a dream can occasionally come under this category, as I think it
does here.
Having said that, this last story is the finest piece of the
three. It explores in a humorous and infuriating way how an overbearing father
can continue to exercise control over his son from his hospital death-bed. The
reader, by the end, is tormented along with Midgley, the protagonist, as his
father wins the last battle between the two, which is to prove his son to be
incompetent.
No comments:
Post a Comment